Again, we got a plan for Plan Reviews for by the designer himself intended. Interestingly (or perhaps of weird that the building is built, we can express in more slowly). Now, I will deliberately not to have almost built a house we may need a Tervkritikára? It asked, so I'll tell you my opinion. But before we go any further, read the accompanying letter.

Editorial Dear!
As a young architect, I had the opportunity to plan their family house, construction of which will soon be completed. I would welcome that if you would tell the unbiased opinions.
Briefly summarize the design considerations raised his own hand:
- An open-plan living-dining-kitchen, the garden as much
- Separate blocks separated parents (bedroom, bathroom, wardrobe staff)
- A child's realm, which is separated from parents as a teen can be used.
Badly wanted to walk around free-standing house, but the site features and changes in building codes did not allow this. Thus, a six-page building was priced option.
Since the area of the buildings were built long ago szabadonállóan, so the neighbors of the existing building also had to adapt, that the minimum distance of 5m between the two buildings. Nam was so fully deploy the side boundary of the house.
The plot size 639 m2, width 16m, length 40m. Maximum build-25%. Page Garden size min. 5m

Installation

The ground floor plan

10 meters from the street line and then pulled back to buildings concept that not only want to use the back garden, but also of the garden (which is why the large-scale retraction). The ground floor is basically two parts. The building was the first half of the living room, dining room and kitchen, the hall has a staircase and from there over the rear garden, master bedroom block oriented employees, bedroom, bathroom, wardrobe.

The entire floor plan shows that all tried to get rid of this area is considered to be superfluous and just enough space left for some functions, which have to be. This highly efficient design of the kitchen most future operation may cause a problem, I feel a bit too small. All other functionally and in terms of floor space sufficient to provide a solution. Because of the small base, however I do not feel justified kandallófal construction of such a large, spacious feeling to be created would have been better would have been toward the living room open to dining room.

This includes the observations that, if the sloping roof over the living room-dining room under the slab if you do not, then this could have been even greater room space and have a megspóroltak slabs.

Floor

The design-builders, the children will receive a separate level, so space is fully distance ourselves from the parents (especially if it will really benefit if you are big).

The upstairs floor plan is actually more efficient than this could not have been constructed all minimal, including the road. One comment on the toilet in the bathroom to accommodate refers specifically to the conduct of lefolyócsövének, as it now is between the kitchen and the living room (unless you have elhúzva).

Facade, mass

Seeing the photos, I assume that in any event, the building will represent a unique character of the street. The mass and form is fine ... a note. The above mentioned living Shallow low roof - looking from the street - in the mass seems to me somewhat less satisfactory. From there, or for a flat roof or to raise enough character stone could have been a solution, so the "hanging out" small flat triangular rather awkward to me.

Summary | Full house shines right through the meticulous planning method, which tries to combine the functionality of a mature unconventional shaping buildings, which of course is an architect's own house is probably more than required. Prospective customers, this will be the most obvious reference building. Since the house is almost finished, so it would be useless for any advice is given, but rather be glad that was constructed.

Although it would have had to appear before, but different - can not be detailed here and now - for reasons only now been Plan review in the above publication, thank you for your patience!

If you would like to show to others in the preparation / completion of the apartment or house, or curious as to what others say about the house you like, you can send it to us , and of course, we present our opinion as to say it. If your house is not yours, but curious what others think about it, it can be submitted electronically. Discretion is because you can do all this anonymously, of course, up to the city (+ district) entering.

and What do you think?

the designer of what you made ​​mistakes?

• own "model plans" tried to sell
• Slave mode only planned or signed
• did not allow for the ideas - self-contained formalism
• only eng. plan undertaken
• unreliability
• failed to consult with the authorities
• you planned, there could be authorized
• 3D designs did not
• could not be built
• költségérzéketlenség

Results

Loading ...

If you liked this writing, sign up for email értesítőnkre

14 posts in "Design 26 Reviews | is based on the reference house"