The day before yesterday she called me a completely clueless.

It must be that the plan is not limited to, the following councils will speak to us but, unfortunately, architects .... again .... but not a very good light, then this is!

He explained that he was responsible for an architect to design her a small, single-storey houses. While preparing the draft turned out that although it is a small village main street is the last house will be brought tervtanácsra. Were lodged, but summarily fired from the plan (draft) because he did not know that the (scenic, historic Protected) area only E1 designer can design a privilege. Puff him.

Well it would otherwise be E3 in a privileges designer fenced E1 designer and his name was submitted under the new one. The jury once again kicked out the plan, saying the jury believes that there is only oromfalas passzolna building. This is not under the regulatory requirements, we are more the builder did not want anything, just the jury.

However, the rapporteur for the construction authority that, as the gable is not mandatory, so there is no wrong in his opinion the plan board, so if you will submit the final plans, the construction authority will allow it, regardless of the decision of the council plan.

Then the builder would have tervezőnél urged to complete the drawings and submit the plans. But she replied that it would only resume if you have the plan of the Council decision. Also noted that since the design had to be an architect, E1, so as it involves additional costs, there will be more in the previously agreed design fee. Also noted that he has made, it is protected by copyright and should not he get the builders to continue in the case planned to advance understanding someone else!

The council has plans for more than two weeks in session, no report has been sent, so the design does not continue, even while other designers began to work as well, so now it does not seem to even care. Meanwhile, months passed and the builders is useless in a (draft) plan, you can not move forward,

He will now do what?

To be given advice, to see who the participants and who does what role?

Design Council | something you want to require the builder to which the scheme of arrangement is not a cause. Fortunate that only advisory, not binding on the decision, but of course much more than the above feeds are needed. The case marked the conclusion of luck is not really interesting for the decision.

Building Authority | as I wrote above, the builder and do not wish to support the idea of the design board's decision into account. This is probably the most important moment in the whole process

The developer | builders to lay, not to understand the permitting process, nor to anyone what you have permission or it does not need to know when to submit a plan tervtanácsra?

Design | built differently from that of the designer must understand the licensing process, you need to know what everyone is entitled, and also that a plan must be submitted when tervtanácsra?

I gave the lady the following advice:

First in a planning agreement with the designer, who undertook the design work, so if he is employed by, you do not have permission, then, of course, the design problem, not the builder. I am not a lawyer, but if a plan is made in such cases, it is very worrisome to copyright (but are not most important).

Second E3 is involved in the planning permissions and planning permission for an appropriate architect as well, but this is not right to ask for extra pay. Here the two made a mistake, it is a company, which was not entitled (not informed of the planning area), on the other hand, the later prize architect involved as an additional service to be validated, which is of course nonsense.

I advised that first - the skill to be gap-building authorities in cooperation - get the two week delay on the plan of the Council resolutions, minutes, as copies, make that supplying the designer, ask him to go to work and give to the construction authority for the plans. The builder - prior information of the artist under construction - to assume the risk that the Council decision to reject the plan in spite of the design plan is administered.

The total design fee will exceed the previously agreed amount, not because he needs to know that what applies to the chosen designer for permission? I advised to pay a penny more (some luck in the process that have not paid anything for the designer).

If the designer would not want to continue working, or insisted that the E1 involved in planning fee for the builder to pay, do not leave it at that. Clarify that the last resort, file a complaint to the regional chamber of architects and will ask the ethics committee to investigate how to make someone a job in it, which does not have permission? In addition, you will be asked to investigate - and it is even more serious consequences may result - how you can make this design a strómant organized in the planning, a separate money just to sign the plans (this is both the jogosultságukkal play and if something, from clear to all well half)? This confirms that the first tervtanácsra submitted plans for E3 designer signed (and therefore also kicked out), while the second design of E1. That is to say the strómankodás pretty obvious.

I think that all of the above to avoid the original E3 designer is more integrity in order to complete the work and his own pocket to pay the strómant than bevállalni a chamber above the ethical test. BUT, you can choose - but it's not really ethical - to leave the whole and also waive all copyright claims, thereby allowing another designer to do the job is finished or a new one make (the latter really did not need the consent), it additional time is detrimental to the builders ..

Stay tuned for further reports can be read.

related materials
252/2006. (XII.07.) Gov. order. advice about the plan
Design Council | History of: VET, EVM, CMP
Design Council | how do they work?
Design Council | What (or who) is tested?
Design Council | how to live in a builder?
Design Council | an illegitimate? Plan Board's decision
Design Council | how to design the house zsűror?
Design Council | simple roof replacement
Design Council | unsuitable for an architect

If you have any advice on the design history / about juries, municipal cases, the Chamber, abusive, objectionable procedures and their opposite, you want to share with readers, please send it to us (not the posts). The most interesting, most instructive cases publish (of course, name, municipality, without naming the design jury because justice is not our goal, but the sharing of expertise).

I need advice on this plan?

• so, in its present form
• so, a wider remit than at present, as the authority
• yes, but much more stringent conditions
• Yes, but only in special cases would be justified
• not as a hotbed of corruption
• not because of something that will be tested, not the moderators
• not because the pay zsűroroknak lenses and therefore can not be
• not because of the existence of offensive specialist when he horse

Results

Loading ...

If you liked this writing, sign up for email értesítőnkre

18 posts in "Design Council | + is suitable for architects'