Design Council | to be some good ones

legislation

Design Council | to be some good ones

The council plans on almost every series ever part of any anomaly, abuse or read about the relationship is unclear. Stand here a counterexample, but all ended well I'll shoot the joke: there is not an exception proves the rule, but in itself is part of the rule.

The theme is a 120-unit residential installation possibilities (of buildings and a number of levels ...) without clarifying concrete floor plans, and only épületkontúrokkal terepmetszettel. Since it was expected that the law is changed within three months (tightened), so I came up with the property developer to give a conceptual construction permit, valid for one year even if you change the rules. So we did.

County seat and urban design advice. President, Chief Architect of the city, the members of the city (mostly) practicing architects. The composition of the jury plan piquant to its members included the head office of the architect, who also competed for this assignment. Good start, I thought, it will smooth lime needed.

The plan was relatively simple description, I think the most important fitting parameters, and this environment was a fitting theme. West of a similar height condominium, on the right street (across the street from a traditional family hézas construction, built on the south industrial area in the north a few villas, framed in the area, it was justified that the mounting height control was that it max. 9 m (3 levels ), respectively.

The comments when it became clear that the plot of a higher level lower than desirable, but the rest of his control options can be used.

The plan of the members of a part do not really understand how criticism to say that a plan that they are not for specific plans, but the meeting, chief architect, each time repeating that there is a category of conceptual approval, so as to "fitting parameters to clarify." It seemed many people had never heard about before. This is the main architect and quickly ran to her room looking for the appropriate legislation, to show their uncomprehending active members, there is one piece of legislation. This tempers calmed down and once again the chief architect to submit a proposal and uniformly accepted.

The full board plan only under the professional aspects were raised, there was no other place even personalities are not appropriate there. These architects, who won the job from the nose through the objective was, if he made any criticisms. Besides him, only I have known to work in this procurement were rivals.

The lesson here is this and how is this bad legislation, which regulates the operation of the Council Plan?

So simple, it is called. Human factor. The plan, advise people form and maintain, and where the fair trade criteria apply and can not be space for personalities, the works elszipkázásának, ellehetelenítésének desire, which the committee of chief architect, where appropriate, to solve problems in focus and seek to members of the legality of the help page claim to fear there is not an architect.

the plan will be presented soon

The problem is with the system - though it is not spoken - but some council members plan to build on human qualities, I believe, it is not possible to influence legislation. If something is left to the subjective decision, there meginoghat of legality, as we previously could read.

The conclusions to be drawn once again to leave it to readers. Stay tuned for further reports can be read.

related materials
252/2006. (XII.07.) Gov. order. advice about the plan
Design Council | History of: VET, EVM, CMP
Design Council | how do they work?
Design Council | What (or who) is tested?
Design Council | how to live in a builder?
Design Council | an illegitimate? Plan Board's decision
Design Council | how to design the house zsűror?
Design Council | simple roof replacement
Design Council | unsuitable for an architect
Design Council | hunting land protection
Design Council | to be some good ones

If you have any advice on the design history / about juries, municipal cases, the Chamber, abusive, objectionable procedures and their opposite, you want to share with readers, please send it to us (not the posts). The most interesting, most instructive cases publish (of course, name, municipality, without naming the design jury because justice is not our goal, but the sharing of expertise).